You sure that you want to say that I took it from you dude?! Because if so, you are a LIAR! That is *MY* scan(s) which I personally scanned and I still have the .PSD master that matches the Original ID number enumerated in "YOUR" metadata! It also predates your version. You also use a Macintosh and these were created in Windows with a different version of Photoshop. Think twice before I really make you look like a lying fool.edjgraphix wrote:If you really want to do this you will need to be accurate, just like I was. Also, I just looked at the first image you mentioned - the Elton John - the version I have is an improved image and not just a lazy copy and upload which was the case on most, if not all of the images you got from me.
AND, just to be perfectly clear to any and all members and fans of accessible album cover artwork, I have no problem with anyone who downloads or uses any image that I have worked on to use however you like. I put effort into every album cover I have uploaded, and did it for the love of the music that these album covers represent, and could only imagine that the images would be appreciated with the same respect. I am only adding the total number of images this dude downloaded from me as a way for him to see how little effort it took for me to be able to dismiss 20% of his original claim.
In fact, I hope to hear some thoughts from other album cover artwork fans about this because I really don't expect to get anything but generalized claims about images that may have been downloaded, but were improved and therefore not a stolen image being passed off as my own. Again, check the dates on the links that I provided with the dates on the artwork at AAX and every one of the images I counted will easily be confirmed as exact copies - no improvements, or work done on them, straight up copies. So far I see that the images I am being matched with have all had additional work done to them before I uploaded the images, so this collaborative image does show that I worked on it too, so hardly the same 1 for 1 image to be counted, but I don't mind helping someone out who could really use some help. So now I will continue to check the images you claim and I'll verify whether your count is accurate - which I'd still like to hear you do for me.
You simply listed bands that you knew that you had scanned and haven't addressed but a fraction. There are clearly a lot of our images in your uploads here.
Yeah, DEFINITELY check the dates (as if I'm too stupid to do so). No, if you fix something from a web site that specifically tells you as part of their agreement with you to NOT share it or use it for commercial purposes, it isn't "yours". You smoothed the bg at the top, wow, what a Photoshop marvel you are! Tell me Mr. Photoshop wizard, what'd you do to "fix" the Traffic Fantasy Factory? If that is the case, the images I raided of yours are no longer yours because I fixed most of them. Many of those images were tracked down to the original source, via Google, where YOU got them in the first place. That's why there are larger versions of some. Your attempt to drag others into this thread to defend you is pointless (and childish) since the policy here is now that such transfers are off-limits. Nice try, though.
"Generalized"? Now you're dancing around dude. What do you want to see to prove that you took them from my site? You're allegedly dong this here because you didn't get the apology that I do not owe you. Now you're trying to lie your way out of the truth that you took these and others from MY SITE.